Jan 152015
 

burden_of_proof-infographic

Some people confuse where the “Burden of Proof”  actually is with the free will debate. The Burden of Proof places the onus on the person making a claim to justify that claim with evidence. Some seem to think that because people experience a feeling of free will, that they don’t hold a Burden of Proof. This is not the case. The feeling of possessing free will is not evidence for the actual ability of free will. The only thing the feeling proves is that they have a feeling of free will. It does not prove the existence of free will anymore than the appearance that trains get smaller and eventually vanish at the horizon proves it actually does.

So who holds the Burden of Proof for the free will debate. The above infographic is here to help out. Basically, the person who claims that “Free Will Exists” is making a positive assertion that they hold the Burden of Proof for. But the Hard Determinist or Hard Incompatibilist often take on the Burden of Proof to “Prove a Negative”. That means they are willing to take on a burden to disprove the positive claim that free will exists. This can be done through a proof of impossibility, in other words, showing how free will is logically impossible as I do in the book Breaking the Free Will Illusion for the Betterment of Humankind. It also can be accomplished by giving evidence that point to free will not really existing. For example, the neuroscientific evidence is some scientific evidence that points to the fact that we don’t really have free will.

Someone who does not hold a belief in free will due to a lack of evidence does not hold a burden of proof either way. The default is not to believe in any existence claim until the Burden of Proof has been met by the person making the positive assertion.

If you find this (animated) infographic useful, please share it on your website, email, or social media with a link back. Spread the information around. And of course if someone claims they don’t hold the Burden of Proof for their “free will exists” position, point them here!

The following two tabs change content below.

'Trick Slattery

'Trick Slattery is the author of Breaking the Free Will Illusion for the Betterment of Humankind. He's an author, philosopher, artist, content creator, and entrepreneur. He has loved and immersed himself in philosophy since he was teenager. It is his first and strongest passion. Throughout the years he has built a philosophy based on analytic logic and critical thinking. Some of the topics he is most interested in are of a controversial variety, but his passion for the topics and their importance drives him to want to express these ideas to others. His other passions include pen and ink line art and digital artwork.

Latest posts by 'Trick Slattery (see all)

  3 Responses to “Burden of Proof for the Free Will Debate – INFOGRAPHIC”

  1. Some proof reading is needed (e.g., “their” -→ “there”). But of course you had no alternative but to make that mistake.

    /@

    • Thanks for stoppin’ by Ant Allan …and many thanks for pointing that out. I fixed it to “there” (There were so many possessive “theirs” in the graphic that I just slipped and used it for “their there is an implicit burden of proof”). Let me know if you see any others I may have missed. 😉

  2. Since we can show that free will is illogical, it is possible to disprove it unlike many other claims. Since we can take no credit or blame for events before our existence whether causal or acausal, we know that the effects are not “up to us”.

 Leave a Reply

applications-education-miscellaneous.png

Comments in this section should be brief, coherent, and to the point, preferably 1 OR 2 sentences long. Due to this, I've limited comments to 500 characters. Using multiple comments at a single turn will not be approved. I'd like for this comment section to be conversational and not intimidating for people to read or respond to. Essay sized posts, though perhaps interesting, should go elsewhere.  Misinformation or fallacies may not be approved. Click here for more comment rules. I appreciate your understanding. Thanks! 'Trick.

 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)